At Prime For Men, our mission is to provide men with accurate, reliable, and actionable health and fitness information. To maintain the trust of our readers and the integrity of our platform, we adhere to the following editorial standards.
1. Evidence-Based Research
Every article on Prime For Men is built on a foundation of scientific evidence. Our editorial team prioritizes primary sources, including:
- Peer-reviewed clinical studies and medical journals.
- Reports from government health agencies (e.g., NIH, FDA, CDC).
- Academic institutions and recognized medical associations.
We avoid “hype” and anecdotal claims. If a supplement or health practice lacks significant human clinical data, we clearly state this to our readers.
2. Fact-Checking and Accuracy
Accuracy is our highest priority. Our research process involves:
- Verification: Cross-referencing claims against multiple high-authority health databases.
- Context: Explaining not just if something works, but how it works and what the limitations are.
- Clarity: Translating complex medical terminology into clear, understandable language without losing scientific nuance.
3. Independence and Objectivity
Prime For Men is an independent publication. While we may earn commissions through affiliate links, our editorial content is never influenced by manufacturers or brands.
- Unbiased Reviews: We highlight both the benefits and the drawbacks of every product we evaluate.
- No Pay-to-Play: We do not accept payment in exchange for positive reviews or higher rankings in our “Best Of” guides.
4. Integrity of Supplement Reviews
When reviewing supplements, our team evaluates products based on three specific pillars:
- Ingredient Transparency: Does the label disclose specific dosages, or does it hide behind “proprietary blends”?
- Manufacturing Standards: Is the product made in cGMP-certified or FDA-registered facilities?
- Dosage Efficacy: Do the dosages in the bottle match the dosages shown to be effective in clinical trials?
5. Regular Content Updates
The world of health and medical science is constantly evolving. Our editorial team periodically reviews our “evergreen” content to ensure it reflects the most current scientific consensus. If an older article contains outdated information, it is updated or retracted.
6. Conflict of Interest
Our writers and editors are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest. We aim for total transparency so that our readers can make informed decisions about their health.